Amid the anger about Redbridge’s decision to introduce nine daily market stalls on Wanstead High Street – and the perceived inadequate consultation before the decision was made – one unanswered question is puzzling.
Why, in a change to a policy which applies across the whole of Redbridge, are more than 25% of the new sites in Wanstead? What have Wanstead shopkeepers and residents done to attract this special attention?
In other market stall news:
* Detective work by residents has surfaced the adverts which made up the consultation last year, which we understand had 80 responses in total and had to be extended because of a poor answer rate. This is the advert that appeared on Facebook (spot the mention of market stalls). It’s fair to say this is opaque at best.

And this is the notice which appeared on an inside page in editions of the Yellow Advertiser last year, a newspaper which – it turns out – is not actually printed any more. Also note the use of the phrase “permanent pitches for street trading purposes”, something which contradicts Redbridge’s statement that they would not be permanent.

- Paul Canal, leader of the Conservative opposition at Redbridge, has written to Redbridge leader Cllr Kam Rai calling for the current process to be halted and for the consultation to take place again. He wrote:
“Wanstead’s high street is one of Redbridge’s best assets. It must not be subjected to poorly considered changes introduced without meaningful local input. The Council has a duty to listen and to act in the best interests of those it serves.” - The petition against the stalls has now climbed to more than 1,200 signatures.





